DELHI-PCPNDT Act and
other stories
-Bijayalaxmi Nanda
Associate Professor, Miranda House
Delhi University
Thought for the day
• “
That society should not want a girl child; that efforts should be made to
prevent the birth of a girl-child is a matter of grave concern. It violates
Article 39(e) of the Constitution of India which states the principle of state
policy that the health and strength of women is not to be abused. It ignores
Article 51A(e) which says that it shall be the duty of every citizen to
renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women. Sex selection is
therefore against the spirit of the Constitution. This is perhaps the greatest
argument in favour of total ban on sex selection”.
– Hon’ble
Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.(Vijay Sharma vs Union of India AIR 2008 Bom.29)
District
|
Census 2001
|
Census 2011
|
South
|
888
|
878
|
South
West
|
846
|
836
|
North
West
|
857
|
863
|
North
|
886
|
872
|
Central
|
903
|
902
|
New
Delhi
|
898
|
884
|
East
|
865
|
870
|
North
East
|
875
|
875
|
West
|
859
|
867
|
Delhi: District-wise Child Sex Ratio(0-6 years)
Cases-numbers and beyond
• 61
to 75 To 50 - the mystery of numbers
• Issue
of portability of portable ultra-sound machines
• Violation
of due process – snapshot of cases.
• Follow-up
action and weak Public Prosecutors
• The
mind set of authorities – Case study of Dr. Mitu Khurana.
Role of Government
• It
is the responsibility of the Govt. To implement laws made by the legislature.
But when the Govt. fails to do so, resort is taken to the judiciary. The
primary credit for implementation of the PCPNDT Act goes to the judiciary.
- Compilation and Analysis of Case-Laws on PCPNDT Act 1994,
Dr. Shalini Joshi (supported by UNFPA)
Snapshots of Cases
Centre and date of
inspection
|
Reason for
sealing/Section
|
Date of desealing
|
Reason for Desealing
|
Naman General & Maternity Centre, Narela (13/3/06)
(NW District)
|
Incomplete filling of Form-F
|
26/04/2006
|
Desealed after receiving explanation from owner
|
Medical Diagnostic Imaging, Rani Bagh (10/03/06)
(NW District)
|
Incomplete filling of Form-F
|
26/04/2006
|
Desealed after receiving explanation from owner
|
Dr. Mangla Telang’s Fertility & IVF Centre, Siri Fort (05/12/07)
(South District)
|
Stng operation by BBC. Case filed in Court (Sections 5 & 6)
|
Registration suspended and 2 rooms of clinic still sealed
|
|
Centres
(SW District)
|
Reason for action
|
Duration
of sealing
|
Reason for desealing
|
G.L. Sharma Memorial Hospital, Palam Colony
|
Improper maintenance
of/missing Form-F/ Records not
maintained
|
From 15
– 50 days
|
All centres are desealed in public interest.
|
Bensups Hospital, Dwarka
|
|||
Sunil Memorial Hospital, Palam Colony
|
|||
Centres
(West District)
|
Reason for action
|
Duration
of sealing
|
Reason for desealing
|
New Medical Centre, Moti Nagar
|
Improper maintenance
of/missing Form-F/ Records not
maintained/ incorrect record keeping
|
17 – 30
days
|
District Advisory Committee unanimously decided to open the seal after
taking an affidavit they will not repeat incorrect record keeping in the
future.
|
Gupta Medical Centre, Paschim Vihar
|
|||
Jawa Nursing Home, Paschim Vihar
|
Letter from
Mitu Khurana
Dear Mam,
I would like to raise questions regarding the following points:
(1) it was a established fact that form F was not filed by hospital in their monthly records still they did not take any action for more than six months. In fact gave a report saying there is no evidence of sex determination.
(2) after i sent them a legal notice they filed a case only against the hospital. Why not against doctor and my in laws.
(3) replied to R.T.I that they did not file a case against other accused because doctor gave a statement that he fills form F in all cases. No other evidence needed .
(4) no answer as to why no case against the people who got it done.
I would like to raise questions regarding the following points:
(1) it was a established fact that form F was not filed by hospital in their monthly records still they did not take any action for more than six months. In fact gave a report saying there is no evidence of sex determination.
(2) after i sent them a legal notice they filed a case only against the hospital. Why not against doctor and my in laws.
(3) replied to R.T.I that they did not file a case against other accused because doctor gave a statement that he fills form F in all cases. No other evidence needed .
(4) no answer as to why no case against the people who got it done.
(5) government has not yet withdrawn the
report or taken any action against people who gave this report. Accused using
that report till date to defend themselves in court.
IN OTHER WORD GOVERNMENT HAS GIVEN THE ACCUSED THE SHIELD TO
SAVE THEMSELVES. THEY ARE NOT PURSUING THE CASE AND NO PROCEEDINGS TAKING PLACE
DESPITE NO STAY IN THE GOVERNMENT FILED CASE.
- Mitu
No comments:
Post a Comment